Ray Property Sweep — Track A

BUILD sweep-202609090905 · Wednesday 9 September 2026 · buy box v21 · payment math v6 · master v9
Read this first

The 5 AM prompt still says “Buy box is v17”. That is four versions stale. This page is built on SWEEP-BUY-BOX v21 and SWEEP-PAYMENT-MATH v6, both dated 2026-09-08, because the file in Drive always beats a version number written in a prompt.

Dashboard spec v9 and master v9 §10 both say the front page leads with Burlington Township. That is now a fossil. Under v21 the front page leads with Marlton and Lumberton. Master v9’s own standing rule settles it: when the buy box changes what the project hunts, the buy box is newer and it wins.

1 · Replies from humans

None. No new reply from any custodian, owner, agent or office since 2026-09-02.

Last contact was Burlington City, Vanessa Bryant-Dale, 2026-09-02: OPRA-Req-26-0575, 26-0576, 26-0577 and 26-0578 all returned Status: Completed. Those four are the delinquent tax list, open municipal liens, tax sale list and outstanding certificates, and delinquent municipal utility accounts for Burlington City. 26-0578 is still sitting in Trash and its thirteen delivered files are still unsaved.

2 · Already done — nobody has to do this again

2026-09-08, evening

Ray sent sixteen OPRA requests. Eight to Evesham, eight to Lumberton. All from raysellsmorehouses@gmail.com, which is the correct address for a government filing. All say block and lot are included.

Record requestedEvesham 13Lumberton 17
Delinquent property tax list18:4318:47
Open municipal liens18:4318:47
Tax sale list and outstanding certificates18:4318:47
Delinquent municipal utility accounts18:4418:48
Abandoned property list, N.J.S.A. 55:19-5518:4418:48
Vacant property registration list18:4418:48
Creditor registrations, vacant and abandoned18:4418:48
Open code violations and notices18:4418:48

Sent to opra@evesham-nj.gov and bquinn@lumbertontwp.com.

This closes buy box v21 §D.3 and the scoring run’s NEXT item 3, both of which still read that the Lumberton request “has not been sent”. It has. The four-item ask in buy box §C, plus the two code-enforcement extras, is fully covered by these eight subjects.

Two things to watch, not to redo

3 · The two towns

Marlton · Evesham 13 · scorched earth

Not USDA eligible203(k) or seller carryOPRA in flight

Ray’s priority town. It runs on the 203(k) or on seller carry, never on the subsidised USDA loan, and a Marlton 203(k) card is never ranked against a USDA card on price alone.

Funnel, 2026-09-08 scoring runParcels
Class 2 residential parcels15,517
Dropped, not a dwelling2
Dropped, no value or no tax bill2
Dropped, unaffordable even with the Honda out14,454
Survive1,059
… of which fit the payment TODAY211
… of which need the Honda excluded848
After removing recent arms-length sales956

969 of the 1,059 affordable parcels are condo units. 92%. The Qualifier field is C#### on every one of them, so that identification is exact, not inferred. Only 58 have any recorded lot size, because condos carry 0.0 acreage.

Garage shows as zero in Marlton and that is a file problem, not a housing problem. Evesham records builder model names in Building Class — PRIMROSE, FOX-B, CONCORD, HERITAGE, YORKTOWN — where Lumberton records structural codes that carry the garage. Marlton is not a town without garages. It is a town whose file cannot see them.

64 COAH deed-restricted units sit right in the affordable band. Resale cap and income limit. Check before anything.

Four parcels carry real condition codes: CHESTNUT-FIRE, STOCKTON-DAMAGE, RANCH-INF DAMGE, FIRE DAMAGE. A fire-damaged house is exactly what a 203(k) finances and what nobody else can buy. They deserve their own look.

Lumberton 17 · best positioned town on the board

100% USDA eligible2.142% effective taxOPRA in flight
Funnel, 2026-09-08 scoring runParcels
Class 2 residential parcels3,710
Dropped, no value or no tax bill4
Dropped, unaffordable even with the Honda out2,180
Survive1,526
… of which fit the payment TODAY677
… of which need the Honda excluded849
After removing recent arms-length sales1,404

179 condos, 12%, and zero condos in the top 25. 352 parcels with a garage in the building code. 440 with a recorded yard. 753 built before 1980. Building Class here carries real structural codes: 1SF, 2SF1CG, 1.5SF1UG, 1SF&B1AG.

The finding: at Ray’s qualifying ceiling, Lumberton has the stock he described and Marlton is largely an attached-housing market. That is a fact about what his budget buys in each town. It is not an argument against Marlton and it is not being used as one. He has the right to choose the town.

The hole in this page, stated plainly

The top 25 rows for each town are not here, and this run could not get them.

Marlton-targets.csv (1,059 rows) and Lumberton-targets.csv (1,526 rows) were delivered into the 2026-09-08 conversation and were never written to Drive. Folder 08 holds only Burlington Township and Burlington City. SWEEP-SCORER-BULK, which the scoring run says carries score_bulk.py in full, was never created in Drive either. This scheduled run has no access to Ray’s computer. So the funnel and the finding survive and not one address does, and no address is going to be invented to fill the gap.

The fix is one upload. Re-upload 0313EveshamTwpmodivbulk.csv and 0317LumbertonTwpmodivbulk.csv into the next session, or the two target CSVs, which are smaller. The session runs the scorer. Ray uploads, nothing else.

Standing rule from the 2026-09-08 scorer-defect file: a file this project cannot open is not a file it has. This is that rule biting for the second time in two days.

4 · What he can actually buy — two columns, always

The binding constraint is not the price cap and it is not the $2,200 ceiling. It is the 41% total-debt ratio against $1,050 a month of car payments. At $5,833/mo gross the 41% ceiling is $2,392. Less $1,050 of cars that leaves $1,342 of PITI room today and $1,891 with the Honda out. With both cars gone the 33% PITI ratio takes over at $1,925, so the second car is worth $34 a month. All the value is in the Honda.

TownTodayHonda outGain
Washington Twp 36$298,517$378,100*+$79,583
New Hanover 25$287,368$378,100*+$90,732
Bass River 01$270,097$378,100*+$108,003
Hainesport 16$262,898$378,100*+$115,202
Southampton 33$258,323$374,125+$115,802
Lumberton 17$257,779$373,338+$115,559
Burlington Twp 06$255,538$370,092+$114,554
Florence 15$255,360$369,835+$114,474
Burlington City 05$212,125$307,217+$95,092
Beverly City 02$199,133$288,401+$89,268

* the $378,100 county loan cap binds instead of the ratio. Marlton is not in this table because it is not USDA eligible and runs on a different financing path.

The Honda-out column is a hope, not a budget, and it is never printed on its own. The six-month advice behind it does not match any rule this project could verify, in three separate ways: USDA’s own handbook says twelve months not six; the rule is written for a co-signed debt where another obligor pays, and both car loans are recorded as being in Ray’s name alone; and that handbook governs USDA Guaranteed, while 502 Direct sits under a different handbook that a mortgage broker does not even originate.

The faster route nobody has put on the table: a release of liability. In practice, the other person refinances the Honda into their own name. No waiting period at all. It collapses a twelve-month wait into a transaction. It is a real favour to ask and it is Ray’s call and theirs.

5 · The call that outranks everything

USDA Rural Development, Vineland Area Office

856-285-7679

Marilu Carmona 856-285-7649 · Yoselin Aparicio 856-285-7657 · state office escalation 856-787-7700 option 4

Say “Section 502 DIRECT” out loud, every time. Most callers asking about USDA mean Guaranteed, which is a different programme with different limits and no payment subsidy.

Two questions. About $200,000 of house between them. One phone call.

  1. Do the 33% and 41% ratios use the payment after payment assistance, or the note-rate payment? 7 CFR 3550.53 is silent and HB-1-3550 chapter 4 did not answer it. Worth about $84,000. The subsidised reading gives about $255,538 in Burlington Township; note-rate gives about $171,381.
  2. Under HB-1-3550, what excludes an instalment debt paid by another party, and for how long? And does that answer change if the applicant is the sole obligor? Worth about $115,000.

Also worth confirming while on the line: that the 1–4 person low-income ceiling of $98,150 and the $378,100 loan limit are current.

Do not read SWEEP-CALL-SCRIPTS v2 down the page. It is a fossil. Its Vineland script leads with the fifth-bedroom overcrowding question and its county script asks about a nine-person income limit. Both died with the three-person reset on 2026-09-08. The phone number and the “say DIRECT” discipline are still good. Everything about bedroom count in that file is not.

Second call, different person, keep the answers apart

The mortgage guy, about the loan he actually writes.

  1. Which programme is the six-month rule from — FHA, conventional, or USDA Guaranteed?
  2. Does it apply when the applicant is the sole obligor and a non-obligor pays, or only to co-signed debt?
  3. Would a release of liability, or a refinance into the other party’s name, work faster?

He may be perfectly right about his own loan and simply not be describing 502 Direct. Treat the two answers as independent.

6 · Off-market and FSBO — Track B signals

Zillow Burlington County FSBO, read 2026-09-09. Fourteen listings returned. Tested against v21: three bedrooms minimum, two full bathrooms absolute, and the TODAY column for the town.

AddressAskBd/BaSq ftVerdict
115 Natalie Rd, Delran$147,4063 / 21,084Only one that clears price and beds
1600 Mount Holly Rd, Burlington 08016$325,0004 / 21,750Over both columns for either Burlington
19 Paul Rd, Maple Shade$384,9904 / 21,614Over price, town not in footprint
48 Kent Ave, Marlton$549,0004 / 21,858Over price by a wide margin
238 Route 72, Tabernacle$499,0003 / 21,476Over price
411 N Church St, Moorestown$499,0003 / 21,296Over price
108 Coopers Kill Rd, Delran$595,0004 / 32,420Over price
101 S Lenola Rd, Moorestown$599,0004 / 32,260Over price
128 Crosswicks Chesterfield Rd, Chesterfield$660,0003 / 21,536Over price
844 Woodchuck Dr, Mount Laurel$236,9002 / 21,152Under the three-bedroom minimum
115 E Kings Hwy 211, Maple Shade$250,0002 / 21,136Under the three-bedroom minimum
12 Evergreen Dr N, Browns Mills$150,0002 / 21,088Under the three-bedroom minimum
1476 Route 38 Trailer 16, Hainesport$124,5992 / 2910Two bed, and a trailer
202 Jacobstown New Egypt Rd 8, Wrightstown$93,5002 / 1840Two bed, one bath

115 Natalie Rd carries two unknowns and neither was resolved this run.

  • The bath count is Zillow’s and may be counting a half bath. Two full baths is the one absolute. Unverified this run
  • Delran is not in the v14 eligible footprint and its USDA status was not checked. Unverified this run

Every FSBO is a Track B candidate by default, because the absence of an agent is itself the signal. A property belongs to Track A or Track B, never both.

7 · Sheriff and listings — report only, no outreach

Sheriff sale is dead as an outreach channel and it stays dead. Confirmed by CWPP A5664. It is read for intelligence and cross-reference and it generates no letter, no call script and no contact task. Lis Pendens is the live channel and there is still no free automated path to it.

Burlington County board read 2026-09-09 at salesweb.civilview.com, countyId=3. 86 rows, 10 Sep through 12 Nov. Re-derived this run, never carried forward.

In the three towns

DateAddressTown
10 Sep75 Five Crown RoyalMarlton
10 Sep505 Westerly DriveMarlton (Evesham Twp)
24 Sep5006 Baltimore DriveEvesham
22 Oct9 Pondview CourtMarlton (Evesham Twp)
24 Sep8 Tarragon DriveLumberton
24 Sep1 Whitehaven DriveLumberton
10 Sep328 Saint Mary StreetBurlington
10 Sep13 Bunting AvenueBurlington
17 Sep113 Fernwood AvenueBurlington
1 Oct1309 Springside PlaceBurlington
15 Oct104 Creekside WayBurlington
5 Nov536 Wood StreetBurlington

104 Barclay Street has dropped off the board. It carried a 3 September date in calendar v2’s derived list and it is no longer on the calendar. 125 Country Club Road, 13 Bunting Avenue and 328 Saint Mary Street have all moved onto 10 September as expected.

5006 Baltimore Drive was already enriched on 2026-08-21 through its auction.com detail page: a 2-bedroom, 1,248 sq ft condo, estimated value $311,012. It is a clean, explained rejection under any buy box this project has had, and it is now on the 24 September list.

No sheriff address was cross-referenced against the FSBO pull this run and none matched by inspection. The full 86-row cross-reference and the auction.com enrichment pass were cut to protect the email and this deploy.

8 · The four board houses, tested once and retired

All four are five to seven bedroom houses surfaced to hold nine people. Three bedrooms is now a minimum, not a target, so they are not disqualified for size. They are simply no longer why the sweep exists. Reported here once against the new payment test, then dropped from the front of the report.

AddressBack end todayHonda outVerdict
132 4th Ave, Roebling44.3%34.9%Passes with the Honda out
383 Woodbine, Browns Mills50.1%40.7%Marginal. Passes by 0.3 of a point, which is no margin
504 Bridge St, Beverly51.7%42.3%Over the 41% ceiling both ways. Out
174 Eastbrook——Unverified this run no payment test on file

383 Woodbine still needs a per-address USDA eligibility check on the live map before it goes further. USDA’s New Jersey Rural Designation notice names Browns Mills as one of eleven NJ areas under review for losing rural designation. The notice is undated and cites 2015 ACS data, so it is probably historic and the outcome is unknown. A review is not a removal. Do not report the address as ineligible on that basis.

9 · Outreach and the letter corpus

Mail queue: 0

The 719 letters are RETIRED and NOT MAILABLE. That includes the 132 that were once marked live. Ray retired the whole batch on 2026-08-30 by name. They are not defective — signature verification passes clean — they simply predate the two-voice split and he binned them.

No letters were written this run, and that is correct. The corpus is retired, the fresh-letter question is still unanswered, and the two new target lists carry no bedroom or bathroom count, so no list off that file may be presented as filtered and no letter may imply that it is. Any new campaign is a new campaign off a v21 rescoring.

Outreach scope, unchanged: off-market owners only. No agents, no counsel, no heirs, and nobody reached because of a foreclosure, a sheriff sale, a bankruptcy or a death. A parcel already in a Track B list never gets a Track A letter.

10 · The board

DateWhatKindNote
4 SepBurl Twp + City assessment listsOverdueFive days past due. Burlington City answered a different set on 2 Sep. Never dropped silently
8 SepBurlington Twp code enforcement OPRADeemed denialSent 27 Aug, due yesterday, nothing received. 47:1A-5(g)
17 SepEvesham and Lumberton, sixteen requestsDueSeven business days from receipt on 8 Sep
25 SepTax pay-by dateEstimatedInferred from the 2025 pattern only. Unconfirmed for 2026
late SepTax sale re-askSoftAnswered in writing 28 Aug: no 2026 date is set. Shayla Steele, CTC, 609-239-5805
9 OctDelinquent list advertisedBandThe highest value date on the board. Cross-reference against the scored targets on block and lot. Unconfirmed for 2026
24 OctUSDA day 60SoftThe clock has not started. The self-assessment has not gone back
6 NovTax saleBandThe outreach window closes here. Unconfirmed for 2026
23 NovUSDA day 90SoftOuter edge of the window Vineland quoted

11 · OPRA log drift

The OPRA REQUEST LOG spreadsheet is the only source of OPRA status and nothing may restate it. It is now wrong in five places and it needs Ray’s hand, because the Drive connector cannot edit a Google Sheet.

  1. The sixteen requests of 8 September, eight Evesham and eight Lumberton, have no rows at all.
  2. The Evesham row still reads “WAITING — day 3 of 7”. That request was received and closed on 2026-08-27 as 26-0562. This is the thirteenth consecutive day it has been wrong.
  3. Burlington Twp tax collector, sent 27 Aug, still has no row. It was answered in full on 28 Aug by Shayla Steele.
  4. Burlington Twp code enforcement, sent 27 Aug, still has no row. Due 8 Sep, nothing received, now a deemed denial.
  5. Burlington Twp assessment list and Burlington City both still read “day 0 of 7”. Both were due 4 Sep.

12 · Today’s moves

  1. Call Vineland. 856-285-7679. Say Section 502 Direct. Ask the two questions in section 5. About $200,000 of house.
  2. Call the mortgage guy. The three questions in section 5. Keep his answers separate from Vineland’s.
  3. Upload the two CSVs into the next session so the target lists get rebuilt and land in this app.
  4. Add sixteen rows to the OPRA log and close the four stale ones in the same edit.
  5. Do not chase Evesham or Lumberton before Thursday 17 September. The clock is not up.
  6. Ask whoever would pay the Honda whether they would refinance it into their own name instead. That removes it immediately, with no six-versus-twelve-month argument.